Category archive
Evaluation and security are one discipline aimed at two failures.
Both questions are the same question asked twice: what does this system do when its input is wrong, and what does it do when its input is hostile. An evaluation harness that cannot block a release and a guardrail that only blocks keywords fail for the same reason, so they belong in one archive.
Articles in Evaluation and Security
-
Synthetic Evaluation Data That Finds Real Failures
How to generate, filter, diversify, and maintain synthetic cases without turning an evaluation suite into a mirror of its generator.
-
Privacy-Preserving AI Is a Dataflow Architecture
Purpose limitation, minimization, isolation, retention, redaction, and verifiable deletion across retrieval, models, tools, traces, and feedback loops.
-
Build an LLM Evaluation Harness That Can Block a Release
From task contracts and test slices to calibrated judges, regression budgets, and production feedback loops.
-
Hallucination Controls Belong in the System, Not One Prompt
A layered design for constraining claims, grounding evidence, verifying outputs, and abstaining when the system does not know.
-
Guardrails as Policy Enforcement, Not Keyword Blocking
Building layered input, action, and output controls that remain testable when language and threats change.
-
Threat Modeling an AI Application End to End
Assets, trust boundaries, model-specific attacks, tool abuse, data leakage, and concrete mitigations for deployed AI systems.
-
Prompt Injection Defense in Depth
Why delimiters are not a sandbox, how indirect injection reaches agents, and which architectural controls actually reduce impact.
Apply the category
Put this against a real system.
If a decision in Evaluation and Security is in front of you right now, the fastest version of this is a call: bring the architecture, the failure you are seeing, and the constraint you cannot move.
Discuss the system